Topics

What's New?


Tags/Keywords

artifacts aspect ratio audacity audio audio service avs converter blogs branding brightcove camcorder cloudberry explorer cloudfront compression embedding firefox flash flash video flv hd hdv high definition iphone joomla jw player mac podcasting publishpod quicktime s3 s3 amazon s3 browser Skype software streaming video tubemogul upload video videocast video channel Video Channels/Networks video format vimeo wordpress xlr youtube

Online Marketing - OnToplist.com
Online Marketing

Free Favicon Generator

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape



CNET comparison between video services

By Rudolf Boogerman | Share this with your favorite social network
2 comments... Click to Contribute.

Cnet is a great source for reviews on hardware.  Whenever I buy a camcorder, I first go there to look up the reviews. This time, they did an excellent comparison test with HD videos between the most important video services offering high definition video hosting: YouTube, Vimeo, SmugMug, DailyMotion, BlipTV, Source and Facebook(which is not really a video service).

They added a neat roll-over feature in the article to compare the test stills (static images) between these services. You move your mouse over service of choice and the image changes.  It is a fast and easy way to compare the compression quality.

Surprisingly enough, YouTube made a serious come-back from having the worst quality compression of all in previous years to one of the best today.  Since they introduced HD video they did a real effort to enhance quality, which is not easy for a network that probably has the biggest load of videos around.  (It reminds me that I will have to adapt my information on YouTube). According to CNET, YouTube was the winner of this comparison test, due to the extras you can do with their player, which indeed are substantial.   Vimeo was the winner last year.

Anyway, here is the article:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10150445-2.html?tag=smallCarouselArea.0

Read also our own article: HD video on the web is not all sunshine which explains about the problems with HD and how to use a workaround for your viewers with slow internet connections.

Topics: Video/audio service reviews | Site search | Write comment
This article has 2 comments.



Related Articles:

2 Comments »


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

If you have any questions or suggestions, you can leave a comment on this article below. Comments are subject to an approval process before they are published. By posting a comment, you agree with the terms of use.

2 Responses to “CNET comparison between video services”

  1. HD art video on YouTube | Miracle Tutorials
    HD art video on YouTube | Miracle Tutorials Says:
    May 29th, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    [...] little bit here and there, but on the whole, HD on YouTube is becoming a good experience. No wonder Cnet was so excited about YouTube a couple of months [...]

  2. HD video on the web is not all sunshine - revised | Miracle Tutorials
    HD video on the web is not all sunshine - revised | Miracle Tutorials Says:
    August 10th, 2009 at 10:25 am

    [...] to this topic, read also CNET comparison between video services related to  HD video [...]

Comments


Most popular posts(Today)

Recent Comments:

  • Lisa: Here’s the link for that extension, FYI: http://extensions.joomla.org/e xtensions/news-production/b...
  • Lisa: Thanks for this article. It’s refreshing to see an accurate review of these two that also acknowledges...
  • Linda Drattell: Yes, thank you!
  • Linda Drattell: Hi, I appreciate all of the information here, both in the article and in the comments, thank you. We...
  • smrutims: Thank you very much for your this article and article on wp verses joomla. I am very new to blogging and...
  • Hotele Szczecin: It’s actually a nice and helpful piece of information. I am glad that you shared this useful...
  • Martin: Hi Rudolf, very interesting so watch changes since 2008… Did you made a new comparison in the meantime...
  • Lloyd: is it possible, each time you click to play a video the video plays in another iframe on the same page?
  • Gfunk-era: Hi Rudolf, Thanks for the info – I’ll have another go on my mac using iMovie and see if that...
  • Giopi: would be wonderful! I think it`s a key point in a conversion soft. :)

Most commented posts

Copyright Rudolf boogerman © 2012, all rights reserved.