Topics

What's New?


Tags/Keywords

artifacts aspect ratio audacity audio audio service avs converter blogs branding brightcove camcorder cloudberry explorer cloudfront compression embedding firefox flash flash video flv hd hdv high definition iphone joomla jw player mac podcasting publishpod quicktime s3 s3 amazon s3 browser Skype software streaming video tubemogul upload video videocast video channel Video Channels/Networks video format vimeo wordpress xlr youtube

Online Marketing - OnToplist.com
Online Marketing

Free Favicon Generator

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape



NaturalReader: voice-over software that does the talking for you

By Rudolf Boogerman | Share this with your favorite social network
13 comments... Click to Contribute.

4 of 5 star ratingYou don’t like your own voice on recordings, yet you cannot afford or have no time to hire a professional voice-over? Here is wonderful software that almost gets it right: NaturalReader. This software turns text into speech with voices that are way more sophisticated then any speech software of your Operating system. It is available for both Mac and PC.

Have a look at this video and you will find out this is much better then any robot voice you ever heard:

Of course it is not perfect and you may have to adapt the spelling if the voice pronounces some words in a strange way. But I think you agree that this is an acceptable result and actually far better then what I do myself if I record video tutorials, for instance. ;-)

interface NaturalReader voice-over softwareThe software works with NaturalVoice voices from several software houses, like at&t, Neospeech and Acapela. You can buy extra voices for a reasonable fee or select a package with two NaturalVoices included, like I did.  The voice I used in the video above was Lucy, a UK voice from Acapela.  For the fun of it, I called her Lucy Acapella.   There is also a Graham male voice in my package but he is not that good. He puts the wrong emphasis almost everywhere. He is only good for short sentences.

The PC version has US, UK, French, Spanish, German, Swedish, Italian and Arabic voices while Mac has US, UK, French and Spanish. The pronunciation per language is quite convincing. Here you can test the voices yourself: http://www.naturalreaders.com/sample.htm.
For some reason, the Mac version is more expensive then the PC version, but it is still very affordable.

Typical problems

Wrong emphasis is the big give away of robot voices and although the NaturalVoice series do a good job, you do not escape from awkward sentences here and there. You can get rid of it by trying to formulate your sentences differently until is sounds natural. Another problem is that some words are cut off too soon. To avoid that, you need to be imaginative with spelling. It can also help to slow down speed here and there. You can vary the speed anywhere you like, thanks to the Conversation Control Panel:

Conversation control panel

It let’s you change speaker, insert pauses and change the speed.  So, if you have a long text, you can vary voices and speed. Using dots helps as well.
There is also the Pronunciation panel that lets you save words with phonetic spelling or you can create shortcuts:

As you can see above, I changed the word Giclees into jeeklays to force the voice to pronounce it properly. Since the word is saved in the list, it will automatically use the custom pronunciation as soon as the software encounters the word Giclees.  That way you can correct a lot mistakes with uncommon words.

I rewrote quite lot of sentences, not only because emphasis was placed on the wrong words, also because it did not sound right. And that brings me to the next topic: NaturalReader as an aid to improve your writing.

NaturalReader helps proofreading

You would be surprised how different text and speech is.  Having a voice-over proofread what you have written helps to pinpoint awkward writing as you hear it being said. I’m not a native English speaker although I lived in the UK for a long time. So, my English is wobbly most of the time. Yet, when I run a text past NaturalReader, I hear immediately something is wrong. It is only a matter of changing the wording until it sounds right. That is an added bonus I did not count on when I bought this software.

Proofreading with a professional voice-over would be quite expensive. Imagine hiring a voice-over, you let him/her test a few sentences and then discover that it needs rewriting. Corrections have to be paid extra, so if you want to work with real voices, running a test upfront with NaturalReader helps you prepare your texts upfront and you can even do that at night.

Voice-overs that never sleep

Another advantage is that your voice-over can work day and night, rehearse a thousand times without getting tired or annoyed and you do not need to pay overtime. And most importantly, they are there whenever you need hem.  No booking time involved.

License fee versus real cost

I actually got my license fee out of it with the first video.  The video above is a bit more then 3 minutes, so count on it that you pay at least $200.00 for a real voice to cover a video like that. I bought the package of two voices for only $69.50 USD (Mac version). The links in this article are no affiliate links, by the way, I have no stake in this software.

Real voice-over versus software

True, a real voice-over professional will do it a lot better since humans are vastly superior in their capacity to express emotion, but if you compare this software with what it produced a few years ago, you will be stunned at the evolution.  Soon, you will no longer hear the difference and real voice-overs make mistakes too. I worked with quite a few of them in the past and a common problem is that they can sound like they are reading text instead of talking spontaneously.  NaturalVoice voices are not reading, they speak, be it in their own funny way, but they have a bright future ahead. So, investing in software like this will help us all in the long run.

I agree there is an ethical problem in a sense that you take away jobs in the voice-over industry, but that is happening in many fields.  I created realistic illustrations for ad agencies many years ago, and I was moved aside by Photoshop. Did that ruin my life?  No, I just changed over  to something else: multimedia.  Never looked back ever since.
Whether you like it or not, robots are gaining on us and it does not help to work against this evolution because it is going to happen anyway.

How about Support?

Support for the software is poor.  I asked them if there was a way to influence how emphasis is placed on certain words but I never received a reply. However, the software is so easy to use that you do not need support, except for this unanswered question, that is.   I suspect they have no answer for this one currently.

In any case, I give NaturalReader software a well deserved 4 stars for excellence.  If their support was responsive, it would have gained 5 stars.

Topics: Software reviews, Video and audio techniques | Site search | Write comment
This article has 13 comments.



Related Articles:

13 Comments »


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

If you have any questions or suggestions, you can leave a comment on this article below. Comments are subject to an approval process before they are published. By posting a comment, you agree with the terms of use.

13 Responses to “NaturalReader: voice-over software that does the talking for you”

  1. Cliff Tait
    Cliff Tait Says:
    December 13th, 2011 at 1:25 am

    Natrual Reader causes Adobe Captivate to lock up when installing/importing sound files…..what to do..

  2. Rudolf Boogerman
    Rudolf Boogerman Says:
    December 13th, 2011 at 6:52 pm

    I think you best contact support, Cliff, because I do not know Adobe Captivate personally. So far, I had no problems importing audios from NaturalVoice into Adobe AfterEffects, but it is always possible that something within the file disagrees with this or that application. Sorry I cannot help you.

  3. Albert
    Albert Says:
    April 2nd, 2012 at 10:36 am

    Hi Rudolf

    Thank you for a great review.

    How would you recommend it is used to create training videos? I’m trying to get my head around how we would use it on a video timeline to ensure that the right text is read in a certain part of the video.

    I appreciate your help.

    Kind regards,
    Albert

  4. Rudolf Boogerman
    Rudolf Boogerman Says:
    April 4th, 2012 at 4:30 am

    Hi Albert,
    For training videos, you will need a screen recorder tool, such as ScreenFlow(Mac) or Camtasia (PC). These tools let you import audio files and you can move them around on the timeline. Camtasia exists for Mac as well, but on Mac I prefer ScreenFlow.

  5. smrutims
    smrutims Says:
    April 30th, 2012 at 6:21 pm

    Thank you very much for your this article and article on wp verses joomla. I am very new to blogging and not technical person. I was just wondering how others make good videos . As my blog is about education I need to make some videos, please if you can guide me more about how to get more visitors to my blog.

  6. Rudolf Boogerman
    Rudolf Boogerman Says:
    May 3rd, 2012 at 1:02 pm

    Hi smrutims,
    It depends what kind of videos you mean. You have screen recorded tutorials, “talking head”- videos and documentary style videos. Screen recording is used to explain software. Talking heads are good to explain ideas, documentary style is more elaborate, with action, flow charts and what not.

    How to make a good video requires investigation. I suggest you go to Vimeo and pick any subject you find interesting and view a couple of educational videos. You will find that some are good, and some are not. Write down what you like and dislike about the videos and use that experience to create your own.

    When your videos are good, you will get more visitors automatically, but you can give it a boost by following the articles on http://www.copyblogger.com. You do not need to buy into his programs, just read his articles and observe what he actually does on his own blog.
    I hope that helps?

  7. Voiceover software | Ewomencleanse
    Voiceover software | Ewomencleanse Says:
    May 23rd, 2012 at 2:41 am

    [...] NaturalReader: voice-over software that does the talking for you …Dec 13, 2011 … You cannot afford or spare the time to hire a professional voice-over? NaturalReader software turns text into speech with sophisticated voices. [...]

  8. sabiha chogle
    sabiha chogle Says:
    June 25th, 2012 at 6:34 am

    i want to call the natural reader software on button click . this button is on my html page. but wen i call it it gives error.. tried many code samples..plz revert back some1….

    function delayer()
    {

    document.getElementById(‘bttnadd’).click();
    window.location.href = “”C:\Program Files\Naturalsoft\free10\NaturalReader10.exe”";
    return false;

    }

    and i tried one more code sample:

    <a href="\Program Files\Naturalsoft\free10\NaturalReader10.exe" rel="nofollow">Play Audio</a>

    none of the above works.. thnx and reply..

    none of the above works..

    thnx and reply..

  9. Rudolf Boogerman
    Rudolf Boogerman Says:
    June 25th, 2012 at 8:24 am

    Dear Sabiha,
    You are calling an .exe file in a browser, so you only have two options: it either shows the code of the exe, resulting in an error, or it will ask you to download it. Browsers are not made to be used as task managers for windows- or Apple native applications.
    Why don’t you simply drag the icon of NaturalReader into the taskbar?

  10. Matt
    Matt Says:
    July 19th, 2012 at 12:42 am

    I like it, but it doesn’t use the correct intonation when forming questions. For example: “A dog.” and “A dog?” would sound the same.

  11. Rudolf Boogerman
    Rudolf Boogerman Says:
    July 19th, 2012 at 5:00 am

    Yes Matt, I agree in some circumstances it messes up, whatever you try. But if you write “Who are you?” then it clearly sounds like a question. It depends on the sentence and it can be a challenge at times to find a workaround.

  12. Eystein
    Eystein Says:
    April 11th, 2013 at 1:01 pm

    Hmm, I bought this… version 11. Does not come with a conversation control :( Hardly any tweekable menus at all. Somewhat disappointed. Pronunciation editor works fine, but it needs to have different settings for different texts, not just one default option for all of them. Often its pronunciation is not wrong per se, only in that particular context. For most texts a V is simply V, but for others it should be pronounced Volts.

  13. Rudolf Boogerman
    Rudolf Boogerman Says:
    April 12th, 2013 at 7:18 am

    Hi Eystein,
    I see they moved the conversation control to the professional version now.
    In that case, try insert this to change voice:
    \Vce=Speaker=Graham\ where “Graham” is the name of the voice.
    \Pau=1000\ to insert a pause of 1 second
    \RSpd=140\ to speedup the speaking. \RSpd=86\ to slow it down. “100″ is standard.
    It’s not sure it will work, but you can give it a try. If it works in version 11, these commands normally take effect from the point they are inserted. You can put them anywhere in the text and as often you like.

    If you want it to say Volts, you have to spell it out. Their claim about reading existing text just like that it over-optimistic, but to be honest, no other software does it better.

Comments

JW Player Skin bundle 1


Most popular posts(Today)

Recent Comments:

  • michael: Hi, your videos are really helpful but this one is not working for me so far. I have followed your...
  • Ramirez: Hi Rudolf Thanks very much for your answer but I was determined to figure this out, and I did ;oD Even...
  • good golden retrievers puppies facts: Hi there! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist with SEO? I’m...
  • Ramirez: Hey there I have been doing a lot of converting in batch mode. My original vids are in 4:3 and I want them...
  • vibhor: Thanks finally it worked. you cant believe i was just pasting the embedded code without clicking on Html.. i...
  • Pit 2012 druki: My coder is trying to persuade me to move to .net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because...
  • Bmk: Rudolph This is so much better of a review than the most i have seen, you are neutral and you do not try to make...
  • Sandy: I am a novice at websites and have requested prices for upgrading for volunteer org. website. One company...
  • Marco Valsecchi: Hi, about the “Skins” point I can suggest this online tool that I made to speed up the...
  • Eystein: Hmm, I bought this… version 11. Does not come with a conversation control :( Hardly any tweekable...

Most commented posts

Copyright Rudolf boogerman © 2013, all rights reserved.