What's New?


artifacts aspect ratio audacity audio audio service avs converter aws blogs brightcove camcorder cloudberry explorer cloudfront compression embedding firefox flash flash video flv hd hdv high definition joomla jw player podcasting publishpod quicktime s3 s3 amazon s3 browser Skype software streaming video subtitles tubemogul upload video videocast video channel Video Channels/Networks video converter video format vimeo wordpress xlr youtube

Online Marketing -
Online Marketing

Free Favicon Generator

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Recommended movie settings for YouTube (17 April ’11)

By Rudolf Boogerman | Share this with your favorite social network
15 comments... Click to Contribute.

YouTube screenshotLet me show you how to achieve the best results when uploading your video to YouTube if you have to edit the movie after shooting.
Through extensive testing, I found the best way to upload with the least artifacts and blurry edges as a result. The test movie used for this purpose is a regular video made with a cheap consumer camera, no special lighting and it did not undergo any form of correction.

Before we start, let me tell you something about compression, because this is reason number One that makes movies look bad on YouTube. Compression is a method to reduce the file size of a movie so that it can play easily on the web and from DVD/CD. Therefore, compression is a great thing, but: although sometimes unavoidable, it should never happen twice!

It is very important to realize that practically all consumer- and prosumer camcorders already put some form of compression on their movies. Cheap models will compress strongly, while the midrange models will use a medium- to light compression. On prosumer camcorders you probably won’t notice the compression, but it is still there. MiniDV tapes offer the least compression since size isn’t an issue on those tapes.

Therefore, if you can avoid it, do not compress the movie again, even if you have to add a title afterwards in your favorite movie editor. Always select “None” for compression, unless the file becomes so big that you can’t upload it. In that case, try to use the best possible compression method with the least compression.

See also for an update on the HD videos on YouTube.

YouTube supports the following formats(checked on 17 April 2011):

Keep in mind that most accounts only allow videos of maximum 15 minutes.
Here is the official Optimize your video document from YouTube.

I recommend:

YouTube says to upload videos with an aspect ration of 4:3 as is, but I recommend to create your own pilarbox on one side of the video because those black bars that appear automatically on YouTube are not elegant and in fact a waste of space. Here is an article how to do that: How to improve quality of video tutorials on YouTube

Detailed recommendation:
If you do not need to do any editing on your movie, .MOV, .MPG, .3GPP, .FLV, .WMV and .AVI are all fine.
Although WMV will not look as well as the other formats but if that is what your camcorder delivers, don’t worry, just upload that .WMV and the movie will not be brilliant, but it will be OK.

If you original video is smaller then recommended, watch my video tutorial on Resizing videos with Flash MX or higher.
An alternative is to use a video editor: How to improve quality of video tutorials on YouTube

Like I said, for audio, I wouldn’t go below 320Kbps (Kilobytes per second) and if it is stereo, keep it stereo unless the file size is too big. That way, you still have a significant audio compression and the quality remains good. Below 128KBps, quality rapidly decreases. It does depend on the audio, though. In some cases you can go lower, but voices deteriorate very easily. If you don’t have time for trial and error, you will be fine with 320Kbps. Better still, do not use compression at all.

The frame rate is the amount of moving images per second. Best to keep the rate of your original movie unless you have a special reason to change it. I would avoid going lower then 15 frames/sec.

Topics: Video Channels/Networks | Site search | Write comment
This article has 15 comments.


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

If you have any questions or suggestions, you can leave a comment on this article below. Comments are subject to an approval process before they are published. By posting a comment, you agree with the terms of use. Backlink spammers won't be published, so don't even try.

15 Responses to “Recommended movie settings for YouTube (17 April ’11)”

  1. Jerry Lamont
    Jerry Lamont Says:
    February 9th, 2008 at 8:24 pm

    You use two different numbers for your recommended settings. At first you say 480×380, then you say 480×360.

  2. Jerry Lamont
    Jerry Lamont Says:
    February 9th, 2008 at 9:21 pm

    YouTube currently limits file size uploads to 100MB. How can uncompressed at 640×480 be a recommended setting if that is sure to go quickly beyond the 100MB limit?

  3. Rudolf B
    Rudolf B Says:
    February 11th, 2008 at 7:25 pm

    Hi Jerry,

    Thanks for telling me. It is 480×360. I’m sorry about that typo, I will correct it.

  4. Rudolf B
    Rudolf B Says:
    February 11th, 2008 at 7:33 pm

    Hi again Jerry,

    You are right that a movie with settings of 640×480 will yield a file bigger then 100MB easily, but this resolution is a recommended size by YouTube. I recommend 480×360, uncompressed, that is to say within reason. If you get a file bigger then 1GB, you will have to use some compression. If you download the YouTube Uploader, you can upload files over 10OMb up to 1GB. You can also compress the files to FLV yourself, so I’m told, but so far I didn’t get good results with that on YouTube and secondly, few people have the option to save to FLV (Flash for video).

    I hope this helps. If you have any further questions, just let me know. Thanks :-)

  5. Jerry Lamont
    Jerry Lamont Says:
    February 14th, 2008 at 12:30 pm

    Great, thanks!


  6. Deef
    Deef Says:
    March 20th, 2008 at 5:33 am

    Try this:
    When viewing a movie on YouTube, add &fmt=18 to the end of the URL. In addition to slight video improvement, you should also notice increased audio quality. Notice I use the word “slight.” I hope YouTube goes further than this humble baby step towards something more like Vimeo’s level of quality.

  7. John Rothko
    John Rothko Says:
    March 21st, 2008 at 9:35 am

    Thanks, Deef. Very useful, and indeed it improves the visual quality considerably.
    For a moment, I contemplated to write a post about this, but then I thought: “Hang on, who is going to do that when they surf YouTube and bump into your video?”.
    Nevertheless, you can add &fmt=18 to your embedding code, that will help a lot,(sometimes it is &fmt=6), so that will give nearly the original quality of the upload. According to my test: If you upload a FLV, with this little hack, the quality is equal to the upload, no difference at all.

    Thanks again for sharing this with us Deef!

  8. AudioAcrobat review | Miracle Tutorials
    AudioAcrobat review | Miracle Tutorials Says:
    June 28th, 2008 at 6:19 pm

    […] For uploading video, FLV is alas not properly supported, thus you cannot control your own compression.  Hopefully, they will add this format in the future because with FLV, you can preview the end result before you upload since it is not tampered with afterwards(see also Recommended settings for YouTube). […]

  9. How to make your video bigger without resizing | Miracle Tutorials
    How to make your video bigger without resizing | Miracle Tutorials Says:
    October 9th, 2008 at 7:03 am

    […] explained in Recommended movie settings for YouTube, the reason why you should not upload a compressed movie to most video channels is that, regardless […]

  10. Ray
    Ray Says:
    January 14th, 2010 at 2:48 am

    You seem the expert on settings, conversions and playing around with youtube :) thanks for sharing this great information, I just have it in my favorites !

  11. Rudolf Boogerman
    Rudolf Boogerman Says:
    January 14th, 2010 at 5:00 am

    Thanks, Ray!

    You may also be interested reading this article on YouTube:

  12. ActualAVExpert
    ActualAVExpert Says:
    November 10th, 2012 at 6:44 am

    using 320kbps on audio is a waste. You will NOT hear the differance between 192kbps and 320 nor uncompressed unless you have a stereo system worth thousands.

    terrible ‘guide’.

  13. Rudolf Boogerman
    Rudolf Boogerman Says:
    November 10th, 2012 at 8:29 am

    Actually, you do hear that difference quite easily, try with a headset of $50.00
    Also, YouTube compresses the video you upload. Therefore, to keep good quality, compress as little as possible. I do not see what is terrible about that. It is less work, and it gives a better end result on YouTube.

  14. celeblish
    celeblish Says:
    June 14th, 2013 at 11:09 am

    We are going to promote our product videos, but we also find some problem, because when we cast the video by iphone5, it is about 850M files for a 5 minutes video, would you please tell me how to minimize the file size but keep the solution.

  15. Rudolf Boogerman
    Rudolf Boogerman Says:
    June 15th, 2013 at 8:37 am

    Hi Celeblish, a video of 5 minutes can be brought back to 30mb or so. Experiment with the bitrate per second. For instance try 1500kbps. But it depends: Are you planning to place it on youtube or play it directly from your site?


Web Hosting

Web Hosting

Most popular posts

Recent Comments:

  • Frederik Rasmussen: You will seriously have me pay over a 100$ on a simple circuit board?
  • anuj: Can we add duration to the playlist preview. Just like in youtube
  • steph: I used to have a perfect and useful version of Natural Reader / Naturalsoft free software, downloaded from the...
  • Greg Kramer: I was surfing and came across your site. You are discussing WordPress and Joomla but there is no mention...
  • Alan: Hey – thanks for making this tutorial. Trying to get this to work with Wordpress. We have a podcast that...
  • Brendan: Does the sony hdr fx1 run on tapes or just battery? I really need to know cause if it runs on tapes I dont...
  • Cove: Thanks for the article! I have started a new business and want to create a web site that allows me to sell,...
  • Thach Pham: Hello, Thanks for your useful review. I’m using WordPress for all of my projects so I can see that...
  • Paul: Hi Rudolf Thanks for great info. I have done as mentioned, however video allows me to enlarge screen to watch...
  • Joomla Perfect: The best solution is do not try to upgrade your Joomla when you have Components like Ads Manager or...

Most commented posts

Copyright Rudolf boogerman © 2007 - 2015, all rights reserved.